Hello Jack, Thank you for the help. I had a short question about this. In principle, is it possible to have the FPGA fabric talk directly to the RJ45 ethernet port on a RFSoC4x2, bypassing the PS side completely?
On Monday, November 10, 2025 at 6:51:11 AM UTC-5 Jack Hickish wrote: > Hi Ken, > > I believe this is (or is close to) supported if you are using a QSFP -> > SFP adapter to send 1GbE out the QSFP port. If it compiles without error, > it's probably supported. > If you're expecting the block to utilise the RJ45 port to which the PS is > connected then this won't work (though I did a bit of work recently > thinking about supporting this which I can point you to in case it is > useful) > > Cheers > Jack > > On Fri, 7 Nov 2025 at 22:29, Ken Semanov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We are going to attempt to use the one_gbe block with an RFSoC4x2. >> >> Is this board supported? Should we modify anything in the platform yaml >> for the board? Are there any other changes we should consider before >> compiling, or during deploy, regarding clocking or constraints? Thank >> you. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "[email protected]" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion visit >> https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/da9b6537-a80f-417d-b108-973438893356n%40lists.berkeley.edu >> >> <https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/da9b6537-a80f-417d-b108-973438893356n%40lists.berkeley.edu?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/1b4be98e-8692-4f33-a5a7-274ecabbbefcn%40lists.berkeley.edu.
