Won't things like multi-table support break binary compatibility anyway? We might be stuck with having to write a tool that migrates from a 0.3 format to a 0.4 format.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jonathan Ellis <[email protected]> wrote: > The fix for 208 [1] is fairly invasive. should we > > (a) release another RC and do more testing before 0.3 final, or > (b) release 0.3 without these changes, and only add this fix to trunk? > > Although I see the 0.3 release primarily as a means to let people > start playing with the cassandra data model, I don't know that I want > to release it knowing that 0.4 is going to be binary-incompatible with > the 0.3 data files. So I'd be inclined towards (a). > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-208 > > -Jonathan >
