I vote for (b). By putting off #208, we can release 0.3 quicker. We should include a few caveats in the 0.3 release, including the potential OOME with a large number of keys on a single node and binary incompatibility with future releases.
Jun IBM Almaden Research Center K55/B1, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099 [email protected] Jonathan Ellis <[email protected]> wrote on 06/03/2009 02:44:50 PM: > > The fix for 208 [1] is fairly invasive. should we > > (a) release another RC and do more testing before 0.3 final, or > (b) release 0.3 without these changes, and only add this fix to trunk? > > Although I see the 0.3 release primarily as a means to let people > start playing with the cassandra data model, I don't know that I want > to release it knowing that 0.4 is going to be binary-incompatible with > the 0.3 data files. So I'd be inclined towards (a). > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-208 > > -Jonathan
