it puts a limit on result set size no matter what kind of columns are in the result
2010/2/3 Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com>: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:23:06 -0600 Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > JE> At least one person is putting in chunks of up to 64MB, so at some > JE> level it "works" but it's not what it's designed for. > > 64MB is pretty decent for my needs actually. I can segment the data > into multiple columns and don't necessarily want all of it loaded at > once anyhow. The result set from a ReadCommand is all in memory though > IIUC, so does that put a limit on the total result set size within a > SuperColumn? > > Ted > >
