It "should" work but not a ton has changed in 2.9/3.0 AFAIK. I'm going to work on updating Lucandra to work with 0.5 branch I can try to update this as well. BTW, if you want to see Lucandra in action check out http://flocking.me (example: http://flocking.me/tjake )
You can use a random partitioner if you store the entire index under a supercolumn (how it was originally implemented) but then you need to accept the entire index will be in memory for any operation on that index (bad for big indexes). -Jake On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Ryan Daum <r...@thimbleware.com> wrote: > On the topic of Lucandra, apart from having it work with 0.5 of Cassandra, > has any work been done to get it up to date with Lucene 2.9/3.0? > > Also, I'm a bit concerned about its use of OrderPreservingPartitioner; is > there an architecture for storage that could be considered that would work > with RandomPartitioner? > > Ryan > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:20 PM, ML_Seda <sonnyh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> i do see the classes now, but All the way back in version .20. Is there a >> newer version of Lucandra. It would be nice for us to use the lastest >> cassandra (trunk). >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://n2.nabble.com/Data-Model-Index-Text-tp4275199p4293071.html >> Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> > >
