Checked the source, yes, it does do timestamp first. Sorry for the misinformation, I must be thinking of something else entirely. It's been a while. :)
-Jonathan On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Tatu Saloranta <tsalora...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Actually (hitting Send jogs my memory :) it was that it does lexical >> compares which is invalid on type 1. So be careful. :) > > Ah. I would be VERY surprised if it produced invalid ones (I wrote the > thing years ago :) ). > Curious about lexical sorting tho. I thought it sorted first by time > stamp, then by Mac. But sounds like it doesn't? > (you could of course you comparator anyway) > > -+ Tatu +- >
