On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Checked the source, yes, it does do timestamp first. Sorry for the > misinformation, I must be thinking of something else entirely. It's > been a while. :)
Not at all, thanks for checking it. I might have mis-recalled it as well... was just trying to think of why I had done it some other way! :-) -+ Tatu +-
