The workload you originally described does not sound like a difficult job for a relational database. Do you have any more information on the specifics of your access patterns and where you feel that an RDBMS might fall short?
-Nate On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Cemal <cemalettin....@gmail.com> wrote: > I was not really expecting such an answer. :) > Any other idea? > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Tatu Saloranta <tsalora...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Very funny! I assume this is related to MySQL's somewhat spotty record >> of actually conforming to SQL standard, right? ;-D >> (the "NoSQL" solution part) >
