Thanks Jonathan,

My 32-bit java version is at: 1.6.0_13-b03. I'll try a java upgrade.
This tracks well with the exact MaxInt -tmp- Data file size

Jon

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Doing some googling, this is a different JRE bug than the on addressed
> by 795: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6253145.
> It is marked fixed in JDK 6u18, so try upgrading to that.
>
> -Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Jon Graham <sjclou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am running a 32-bit linux version 2.6.27.24. My original data set was
> > copied from a 64-bit cassandra cluster to a 32-bit cassandra cluster. I
> am
> > trying to load balance the data on a 32-bit cluster.
> >
> > Is the cassandra-795 issue applicable for 32-linux too for the 0.5.0
> > release?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jon
> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jon Graham <sjclou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Reached an EOL or something bizzare occured. Reading from: /
> 192.168.2.13
> >> > BufferSizeRemaining: 16
> >>
> >> This one is harmless
> >>
> >> > java.io.IOException: Value too large for defined data type
> >> >     at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.transferTo0(Native Method)
> >> >     at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.transferToDirectly(Unknown Source)
> >> >     at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.transferTo(Unknown Source)
> >> >     at
> >> > org.apache.cassandra.net.TcpConnection.stream(TcpConnection.java:226)
> >> >     at
> >> > org.apache.cassandra.net.FileStreamTask.run(FileStreamTask.java:55)
> >> >     at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown
> >> > Source)
> >> >     at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
> >> > Source)
> >> >     at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> >>
> >> This one is killing you.
> >>
> >> Are you on windows?  If so
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-795 should fix it.
> >> That's in both 0.5.1 and 0.6 beta.
> >>
> >> -Jonathan
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to