Not taking exception, but what's hard to consume or navigate about it? The generated output is in HTML which is fully searchable and can be hyperlinked until the cows come home...
Symon. On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't mean to be negative, but IMO that output format sucks. It's > like something which would have been acceptable 15 years ago. There > must be something we can do which presents the information in a way > which is slightly easier to navigate, the web is not a book. For my > part, the current documentation is presented in a format which is much > easier to consume. If we could make it easier to update the docs on > the Castle site, that would be better. > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > While everyone is on the topic of change, do we want to move to the > docbook > > documentation that Symon Rottem set up a while back? It should make it > > easier to write documentation. > > > > Do we really need multiple copies of the documentation hosted like we > have > > now? Because documentation tends to lag behind and is always being > updated > > after a release it might be better to have one copy like jQuery has. > > > > MonoRail example of the docbook format: > > http://www.symbiotic-development.com/monorail/html/index.html > > > > -- > > Jonathon Rossi > > > > > > > > > > > -- Symon Rottem http://blog.symbiotic-development.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
