A quick google search (online docbook editor) shows that there looks to be projects around that combine "wiki style" websites with docbook generators, which may provide an easy way to maintain docbook stored documentation. I know there are some decent offline tools for docbook also, I've used lyx which is a WYSIWYG editor for structured editing, although editing the raw files might be clean as well.
Keep in mind I haven't used any of these before, so I don't have anything valuable to say about the projects found :). Thanks, Rick Fleming On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Bill Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am not very familiar with docbook docs (other than reading them), but > I really do like the output. Would it be written in the repo and the > sites generated or would it be some sort of collaborative online thing? > > Jonathon Rossi wrote: >> While everyone is on the topic of change, do we want to move to the >> docbook documentation that Symon Rottem set up a while back? It should >> make it easier to write documentation. >> >> Do we really need multiple copies of the documentation hosted like we >> have now? Because documentation tends to lag behind and is always >> being updated after a release it might be better to have one copy like >> jQuery has. >> >> MonoRail example of the docbook format: >> http://www.symbiotic-development.com/monorail/html/index.html >> >> -- >> Jonathon Rossi >> >> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
