FYI: I guess I was wrong about silverlight not supporting any serialization. I just learned you can add a reference to System.Xml.Serialization. Not sure how that compares to what's already in the DP, but if serialization is a must have (in silverlight), that could be a path to explore...
2008/12/29 hammett <[email protected]> > I'll let you know after reviewing the patch. Thx > > 2008/12/29 Staxxx <[email protected]>: > > Krzysztof, Thanks for the suggestion... > > I just took a look and it looks like their Silverlight implementation is > > very similar to what's in my patch... > > > > However if their implementation looks better I'd be happy to try and > > leverage that??? > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Krzysztof Koźmic > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Jason, > >> > >> Take a look at MEF codebase. Last time I checked it had an > >> implementation of a lock that does just that: > >> wraps a ReaderWriterLockSlim for non-silverlight apps, and Monitor calls > >> for Silverlight. > >> Since its MS-PL I think it's ok to use that code. > >> Hammett? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Krzysztof > >> > >> Staxxx pisze: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > Let me know how this patch looks... > >> > > >> > FYI: double check the SlimReaderWriterLock as I'm not completely > >> > comfortable with that... > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Jason > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
