At work, we're just using MSBuild to build the silverlight projects files etc... How do you want them to build?
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > When we get our build files adapted to sl, which I have no idea how to do > it.. > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Staxxx <[email protected]> wrote: > > When do you think we will see the "official" binary of the Silverlight > > Dynamic Proxy? > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 12:18 PM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Applied. Thanks > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:02 PM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Yep, looks good now. Thanks > >> > > >> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Staxxx <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hello, > >> >> Here's another revision of the Silverlight patch. > >> >> The only thing I mimicked about the MEF version is leveraging the > >> >> Microsoft > >> >> System.Threading.ReaderWriterLockSlim under the hood in the full > >> >> framework > >> >> version... > >> >> The way it's being used in the dynamic proxy required the 'upgrade > from > >> >> reader to writer' scenario. When we call EnterReadLock/ExitReadLock > on > >> >> the > >> >> full framework it's actually > >> >> calling EnterUpgradeableReadLock/ExitUpgradeableReadLock so the > >> >> subsequent EnterWriteLock/ExitWriteLock wouldn't fail with an > >> >> exception. > >> >> If this isn't going to work, would you mind coaching me a little more > >> >> on > >> >> what specifically isn't correct? I'd like to attempt to write some > unit > >> >> tests around any scenarios this thing may need to specifically > support. > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Jason > >> >> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:58 PM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> The SlimReaderWriterLock still wrong. Check MEF's codebase please. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Staxxx <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > Hello, > >> >>> > Let me know how this patch looks... > >> >>> > FYI: double check the SlimReaderWriterLock as I'm not completely > >> >>> > comfortable > >> >>> > with that... > >> >>> > Thanks, > >> >>> > Jason > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Cheers, > >> >>> hammett > >> >>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Cheers, > >> > hammett > >> > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> hammett > >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
