I haven't had a chance to yet, but I'm going to take a look this weekend. I'll try to take a look asap.
Thanks for all the work and rework after discussing it. On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Krzysztof Koźmic < [email protected]> wrote: > > Jonathon, > > Have you had the time to review the patch for InterceptorSelector? If > you have any feedback on the implementation, since it's weekend I could > work on it a little. > > cheers > Krzysztof > > Jonathon Rossi pisze: > > *DynamicProxy2* is fairly stable. I was planning to wait until the > > Silverlight and Interceptor Selector work has been finished and > > settled for a bit before making a release. There are 13 unresolved > > issues which I need to have a good look at. I have been writing some > > documentation, but haven't got back to finishing off the initial work > > to get some feedback. If no show stoppers arise, I'd expect sometime > > in March. > > > > *NVelocity* is stable, and has been for quite some time. There are 14 > > unresolved issues with several of them being enhancements. To be > > honest, I haven't done anything to resolve the open issues, but I plan > > to soon. Since Ken has suggested that MonoRail would be released > > March-ish, and since NVelocity is mainly used as a MonoRail view > > engine (however I know others including myself use it for non-MonoRail > > things) it should be released before MonoRail. I expect by the end of > > February would be an appropriate time. At this stage I haven't updated > > the documentation, but I plan to write some basic documentation on how > > to use it without MonoRail and update what we have at the moment, > > which may include some repetition of what the Velocity pages contain, > > but this isn't a big deal since the projects are no longer so similar. > > > > *VS Wizards/Integration* are out of date (both with Castle and with > > VS2008 support) and to be honest again, I haven't done anything to get > > them usable. Personally, I don't know if a ActiveRecord project > > template is very useful because you can use ActiveRecord in different > > ways (ActiveRecordBase or not), while the current wizards might be > > promoting ActiveRecordBase when most of us don't use it. I know this > > is off topic but there is also quite a few ways to set up MonoRail so > > do we want a fairly basic template just to get devs started or > > something much more? I have never used the wizards for anything real > > because I just look at another project to set up a new project. Maybe > > all we need is to make better sample projects and keep them up to date > > since most of our users should be fairly comfortable with building a > > project from a sample (or just renaming a sample project). I also > > don't know if we want to integrate Castle Visual Studio Integration > > from the contrib with the new project wizards. With that said there > > are quite a few blocking issues before this can be released. > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, hammett <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > Guys, it's been two months and a half since the project was split and > > new leaders stepped in. In the name of transparency I'd like to ask > > each of the new leaders the following questions: > > > > > > - Your project name: > > > > - What's its status (Stable, unstable) > > > > - What have you done towards releasing it? What's the stopper? > > > > - Any ETA for the release? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > hammett > > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jonathon Rossi > > > > > > > > > > -- Jonathon Rossi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
