And then the AbstractTransaction is a bit strange, with its private fields monitoring state, when you yourself in subclasses would like to monitor it as well.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tuna Toksoz Sent: den 4 april 2009 13:48 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Who is responsible for Services.Transactions? as far as i know, you can still do that as is, with the events on TransactionManager and TransactionScope. Tuna Toksöz Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz http://tunatoksoz.com http://twitter.com/tehlike On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Jonathon, It’s not so much help as it’s extending it with native vista/server 2008 kernel transactions… I need someone to discuss that with. Regards From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi Sent: den 4 april 2009 11:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Who is responsible for Services.Transactions? Ernst Naezer is the project lead for the transaction services as per http://www.castleproject.org/castle/projects.html However, you should post your questions to either this list (for development of the project) or the castle users list (for help with using the project). This allows anyone to help you. On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, Could you tell me who is responsible for the Transactions project? Regards -- Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
