[Test]
public void TransactionResources_AreDisposed()
{
var txM = _Container.Resolve<ITransactionManager>();
var t = txM.CreateTransaction(TransactionMode.Requires,
IsolationMode.Unspecified);
var resource = new TestResource();
t.Enlist(resource);
t.Begin();
// lalala
t.Rollback();
txM.Dispose(t);
Assert.That(resource.wasDisposed);
}
private class TestResource : IResource, IDisposable
{
public bool wasDisposed;
public void Start()
{
}
public void Commit()
{
}
public void Rollback()
{
}
public void Dispose()
{
wasDisposed = true;
}
}
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henrik Feldt
Sent: den 6 april 2009 07:20
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Patch for MicroKernel when passed null in a component
registration
Added disposable resources.
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henrik Feldt
Sent: den 6 april 2009 00:30
To: [email protected]
Subject: Patch for MicroKernel when passed null in a component registration
Changes in Registration/Component.cs and
Tests/ComponentRegistrationTestCase.cs
Problem: When you use Type.GetType, which I use (because I need a type in a
facility which I can't reference directly and it doesn't make sense to open
it up to changes in the config file which ships with the application), and
for some reason the application can't load that type, the method call
returns null and so the MicoKernel fails where it shouldn't fail, assuming
the implementation isn't null.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
