Er, kind of conflicts with:

Fetch=FetchEnum.Join

no?

2009/5/7 Roelof Blom <[email protected]>

> Yeah, I don't like it either. How about Fetch.Immediate and Fetch.Proxy
> (the terminology comes from paragraph 16.1 NH Reference 
> documentation<http://knol.google.com/k/fabio-maulo/nhibernate-chapter-16/1nr4enxv3dpeq/19#>
> )
>
> -- Roelof.
>
> 2009/5/6 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>
>  But please, rename the LazyEnum type.
>>
>> Markus Zywitza pisze:
>>
>> Will still go into Alpha 1. Thanks for the contribution, especially
>> for one with tests ;-)
>>
>> -Markus
>>
>> 2009/5/6 Lee Henson <[email protected]> <[email protected]>:
>>
>>
>>  I've uploaded a patch with the following ticket on donjon:
>> http://support.castleproject.org/projects/AR/issues/view/AR-ISSUE-253
>>
>> which adds:
>>
>> [BelongsTo .... Lazy=LazyEnum.Proxy]
>> [BelongsTo .... Lazy=LazyEnum.False]
>>
>> Markus, I'm not sure what your release plans are at the moment so I've
>> left it as a patch rather than just committing it outright.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to