How about FetchWhen.Immediate and FetchWhen.OnInvoke ?

It would also be more appropriate to rename the existing FetchEnum to
FetchHow, which would of course break existing code.

2009/5/7 Lee Henson <[email protected]>

> Er, kind of conflicts with:
>
> Fetch=FetchEnum.Join
>
> no?
>
> 2009/5/7 Roelof Blom <[email protected]>
>
> Yeah, I don't like it either. How about Fetch.Immediate and Fetch.Proxy
>> (the terminology comes from paragraph 16.1 NH Reference 
>> documentation<http://knol.google.com/k/fabio-maulo/nhibernate-chapter-16/1nr4enxv3dpeq/19#>
>> )
>>
>> -- Roelof.
>>
>> 2009/5/6 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>>
>>  But please, rename the LazyEnum type.
>>>
>>> Markus Zywitza pisze:
>>>
>>> Will still go into Alpha 1. Thanks for the contribution, especially
>>> for one with tests ;-)
>>>
>>> -Markus
>>>
>>> 2009/5/6 Lee Henson <[email protected]> <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>
>>>  I've uploaded a patch with the following ticket on donjon:
>>> http://support.castleproject.org/projects/AR/issues/view/AR-ISSUE-253
>>>
>>> which adds:
>>>
>>> [BelongsTo .... Lazy=LazyEnum.Proxy]
>>> [BelongsTo .... Lazy=LazyEnum.False]
>>>
>>> Markus, I'm not sure what your release plans are at the moment so I've
>>> left it as a patch rather than just committing it outright.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to