Check Environment.OSVersion.Platform? On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote:
> If there is something similar for Mono, that would be great, because we > wouldn’t need platform-specific compiles… > > > > Regards, > > Henrik > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Roelof Blom > *Sent:* den 30 maj 2009 23:51 > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Castle Transactions > > > > You need to check at runtime, don't you? Use something like this > > if(Environment.OSVersion.Version.Major > 5) { /* vista and above */ } > > > > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually, no, because it’s built on the vista kernel and hence supports TxF > and TxR, but I’m not sure what to do about Win5 and lesser. Is there some > sort of compile-constant for it? This is the way it currently looks, and I > think I need something pre-vista and not just MONO: > > > > Example: > > /// <summary> > > /// Deletes a folder recursively. > > /// </summary> > > /// <param name="path"></param> > > public void Delete(string path) > > { > > AssertAllowed(path); > > #if !MONO > > IFileTransaction tx; > > if (HasTransaction(out tx)) > > { > > ((IDirectoryAdapter)tx).Delete(path); > > return; > > } > > #endif > > Directory.Delete(path); > > } > > > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Roelof Blom > *Sent:* den 30 maj 2009 20:15 > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Castle Transactions > > > > Non-Vista would also be Windows 7 RC? > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Cool, np. I’ve changed it. Quite ready to commit now. I guess it’s patching > that’s it for me, right… > > > > I need someone to test on non-vista systems and mono to make sure the new > code paths don’t become activated. Volunteers? > > > > Cheers, > > Henke > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jonathon Rossi > *Sent:* den 30 maj 2009 16:18 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Castle Transactions > > > > Shouldn't it be using Castle's ILogger in Castle.Core, which indirectly can > depend on log4net. > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we make it depend on log4net? > > > > > > > > > -- > Jono > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
