Oh... I like that option. Yeah. I knew about the "add other accounts to your repositories." That's what the Collaborators are for. What I'm concerned about is being able to administer the account itself should something happen to Roelof (God forbid) - since it's essentially the container for the repositories. For instance, who would create the forks? My understanding is that right now, that responsibility would fall to Roelof.
- rb On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Daniel Hölbling <[email protected]>wrote: > Richard, Actually GitHub supports that too. You can add other accounts as > admins to your repositories. So (although I still think you should > distribute the credentials), all PMCs can administer the repositories as > themselves without having to impersonate the castleproject user. > > btw.. I vote for Castleproject while keeping the Castle username reserved > :) > > greetings Daniel > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:42 PM, G. Richard Bellamy < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I know Roelof created an account on github (github.com/castleproject). I >> was thinking maybe we wanted github.com/castle, so I went ahead and >> created it... which one do you think is best? I actually like Roelof's >> (since it corresponds nicely with www.castleproject.org), but I thought >> it would be good to have a choice. >> Regardless, I think that whichever one we use, everyone in the PMC should >> have the account credentials, to guard against the "hit by a bus" scenario. >> >> - rb >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
