as for AR and NH, I think we can actually not include them at all. The AR Binder is known to be released against version X of AR, and people who wants Ar Binder probably already have AR with NH. I actually wants to take the AR Binder out of the release zip, and into a separate zip.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > Newtonsoft.Json.dll (and .xml), NHibernate.dll and Iesi.Collections.dll are > different according to svn. NHibernate.xml is missing by the way. > > 2010/1/18 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > >> On 2010-01-18 18:48, Artur Dorochowicz wrote: >> >>> To that I would also add: >>> - custom/own (?) build of Newtonsoft.Json - I can't seem to find >>> matching official version (current is 3.5 Release 6 >>> http://json.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=37810) >>> >>> >> Isn't Newtonsoft.JSon used in the package just the 3.5r6 version? I think >> John updated it to this version >> >> - own build of NHibernate - this comes from AR, but IMHO only >>> NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle should be recompiled against newer version >>> of DynamicProxy >>> >>> >> Same here - NHibernate.dll and all its hard dependencies TTBOMK are the >> official version from NHibernate package >> just bytecodeprovider got recompiled >> >> - own build of NHibernate.Linq - again, from AR and probably only >>> because of own build of NH >>> >>> >> NHibernate.Linq (semi-official/official version) does not have strong >> name, that's why it got recompiled. >> >> - missing (?) Castle.Services.Logging.NLogIntegration assembly >>> >>> >> oups, that's our omission I'm afraid. >> >> I think that people prefer official releases of dependencies, I know I >>> do. You seldom use Monorail alone in your application and other >>> frameworks often depend on the same stuff that Castle does (e.g. >>> NHibernate). Using custom builds may force users to recompile other >>> dependencies and is just cumbersome. >>> >>> >> Yeah, I agree, that's why we should try to keep that down to minimum. >> >> cheers, >> Krzysztof >> >> On 18 Sty, 16:14, Roelof Blom<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Also, some Castle assemblies (for instance Binder, AR) have symbols >>>> while >>>> others do not. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Roelof Blom<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Why is Castle.MonoRail.Framework.Tests.resources.dll included in the >>>>> zip >>>>> download of MonoRail? It's in the 'de' and 'nl' folders. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.delver.com http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.idcc.co.il - הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
