Mauricio, All very good points :) Inline
Cheers John On Feb 16, 12:29 pm, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> wrote: > * It's simpler to have one SCM than two. I agree, but I thought we were going to freeze svn and make it readonly, or is this not the plan? > * Browsing history is a big selling point of git, since you have all > history locally there is no network overhead. No problems with this except maybe as Roelof pointed out "I expected to see only "relevant" commits" to the current project. > * Browsing history is useful to find out breaking changes and their > rationale (I blogged about this some time > ago:http://bugsquash.blogspot.com/2009/09/browsing-open-source-code-histo... > ) Agree > * People do use history for other things, as I showed earlier in this > thread. My answer to the people that ask for the RC2 source code, is, "mate if you survived this many years with that bug then why add a fix now, maybe it is time to upgrade" > * Rails migrated the whole history, from the first revision in > 2004:http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/db045dbbf60b53dbe013ef25554fd013... > . I'm not a Rails user, but I can't find anyone complaining about > this, and they have a lot more activity and people involved than > Castle will probably ever have. Good on them ;) > * We can place a readme.txt in each repository recommending shallow > clone, github automatically picks it up and displays it, as > inhttp://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.Cache Very cool, I also learned that we can add markdown readme files :) > * I didn't know that JIRA was already ready to be used, but this git > migration page is temporary anyway. Read my other thread on this. > * donjon patches can be applied without any > problems:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/659467/how-to-apply-svn-diff-to-git That is good :) > > Cheers, > Mauricio > > On Feb 15, 7:08 pm, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm not sure about everyone else, but I'm with Ken on this one, do we > > really 6yrs of history? Also aren't we going to keep svn around as > > readonly anyway? > > I much rather have a small d/l (yes I know you said I can do a shallow > > clone, but if this is not the default option in git then I think we > > are going to annoy a lot of people). > > > Also, we should start publishing content on the new website (http:// > > castle.jira.com/wiki/dashboard.action), not the "using" one. > > > Regarding feedback (just a few that come to mind): > > - The following Website pages need to be > > updated:http://www.castleproject.org/community/patch.htmlhttp://www.castlepro... > > - A new guide on how to contribute needs to be written > > - A new patch management guide needs to be created > > - What is going to happen to the patch files that currently are in > > Donjon and haven't been applied yet? > > > Cheers > > John > > > On Feb 16, 7:56 am, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > I was waiting for some feedback, but yes, TeamCity can be pointed to > > > the git ARFacility repository now. > > > > I just created a wiki page with the missing projects to > > > migrate:http://using.castleproject.org/display/CASTLE/Git+migration > > > > Feel free to take on any of them. > > > I'll probably look into InversionOfControl tonight as it might have > > > some complications. > > > > Cheers, > > > Mauricio > > > > On Feb 15, 5:01 pm, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If this is the case then why is the build server still building > > > > against svn? > > > > > Also, how about everything else? Is each person suppose to do their > > > > own? > > > > > Cheers > > > > John > > > > > On Feb 16, 12:50 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi John, > > > > > > The ARFacility has moved for real, this is not a test :-) > > > > > > -- Roelof. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:33 AM, John Simons > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > I'm a bit lost here! > > > > > > Has ARFacility moved to Git for real? or are you still testing the > > > > > > migration process? > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > John > > > > > > > On Feb 11, 3:43 pm, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I just migrated the ARFacility: > > > > > >http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.ActiveRecordIntegra... > > > > > > > > Here's a step by step guide of the process, complete with > > > > > > > screenshots: > > > > > >http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddvpz7mf_202gzpzbjcx > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Mauricio > > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 10:07 am, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Roelof has tried my process with ARFacility and it turned out > > > > > > > > it isn't > > > > > > > > very clear, I will run the process on another project, then > > > > > > > > copy & > > > > > > > > paste here the exact commands I run plus maybe a couple of > > > > > > > > screenshots. > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Mauricio > > > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 3:54 am, Krzysztof Ko¼mic <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Do we move officially to Git now with the projects that were > > > > > > released? > > > > > > > > > > Krzysztof > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > > Groups > > > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > . > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%2Bun > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > . > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
