Done. git:// github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.AutomaticTransactionManagement.git
-- Roelof. On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: > :) When you’ve migrated it > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Roelof Blom > *Sent:* den 19 februari 2010 21:25 > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: So do we GIT now? > > > > huh? > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tell me updates as you go, please. > > > > Cheers, > > Henrik > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Roelof Blom > *Sent:* den 19 februari 2010 20:38 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: So do we GIT now? > > > > I am currently working on moving the AutoTX facility. > > 2010/2/19 Henry Conceição <[email protected]> > > Ok, so I'll continue to move some repos to github. > > I'm planning to move all the facilties on the next days. Is everybody > ok with that? > > > Cheers, > Henry Conceição > > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:21 PM, John Simons <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Agree > > > > On Feb 18, 5:19 am, Henry Conceição <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So, we all agree that one scm is better than two and there is no > >> problem to have all the history and not only the relevant part for > >> each repo? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Henry Conceição > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Inline > >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM, John Simons < > [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> >> Mauricio, > >> > >> >> All very good points :) > >> >> Inline > >> > >> >> Cheers > >> >> John > >> > >> >> On Feb 16, 12:29 pm, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > * It's simpler to have one SCM than two. > >> >> I agree, but I thought we were going to freeze svn and make it > >> >> readonly, or is this not the plan? > >> > >> > Which thread was that decided on? I don't like the idea of having two > SCM's, > >> > see the recent thread on the users list about APTCA in which people > checkout > >> > from the "wrong" svn project. Another reason not to keep SVN is to > bring > >> > down bandwith costs for Stronghold. > >> > >> >> > * Browsing history is a big selling point of git, since you have > all > >> >> > history locally there is no network overhead. > >> >> No problems with this except maybe as Roelof pointed out "I expected > >> >> to see only "relevant" commits" to the current project. > >> > >> > As I also pointed out this was my expectation, which can be far off > reality > >> > :-) > >> > I'm with Mauricio on this. If all that history is really annoying the > hell > >> > out of somebody he can always do some magic with git-filter-branch. > >> > >> > -- Roelof. > >> > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
