Is this a good gitignore file:
http://www.alexhoffman.us/gitignore-for-net-projects-gist-at-github
?

On Feb 23, 3:32 pm, Henry Conceição <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Facilities are done.
>
> Next step: Components.
>
> Ps: As John mentioned in another thread, Castle.Services.Transaction
> still a first class repository and should not be deleted.
>
> Cheers,
> Henry Conceição
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Inline
>
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM, John Simons <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Thanks guys, good links :)
>
> >> Re repositories on github, I've noticed we've added a submodule for
> >> the buildscripts to the already migrated projects, I was wondering if
> >> it makes also sense to add the buildtools(Nant, nunit, ....) as
> >> submodules so that we can just clone and build?
>
> > I've tried this but submodules work differently than svn:externals, and come
> > with a whole share of problems, check this out:
> >http://progit.org/book/ch6-6.html
>
> >> Also, the following repositories can be deleted:
> >> Castle.Components.EmailSender
> >> Castle.Facilities.BatchRegistration
> >> Castle.Services.Logging
> >> Castle.Facilities.Cache
> >> Castle.Services.Transaction
>
> > Will do
>
> >> and finally, the presentation that Krzysztof  pointed me to
> >> mentions .gitignore file, should we add this file to each repository
> >> to exclude bin, obj,....?
>
> > Yup
>
> >> Cheers
> >> John
>
> >> On Feb 22, 7:54 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > John,
>
> >> > watch this
> >> > presentation:http://jagregory.com/writings/git-e-van-recording/
>
> >> > very good stuff that will kickstart you into using git
>
> >> > On 22 Lut, 08:47, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > Mauricio or Henry,
>
> >> > > Can I please have one of you migration "TemplateEngine Component"?
> >> > > I would do it, but I have zero experience using git, so I feel very
> >> > > nervous doing it!
>
> >> > > Also, can someone give me some pointers on what to install on my
> >> > > workstation? Do I install both msysgit (any specific configuration or
> >> > > just use defaults when installing it) and tortoisegit? Any advice is
> >> > > welcomed :)
>
> >> > > Cheers
> >> > > John
>
> >> > > On Feb 20, 10:19 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > 10x
>
> >> > > > 2010/2/20 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>
>
> >> > > > > I can take care of MR too, if someone doesn't step in.
>
> >> > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > > Henry Conceição
>
> >> > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > any chance someone might be able to do the history trick for MR?
> >> > > > > > all of my spare OSS time is now consumed by performance
> >> > > > > > improvements to
> >> > > > > > AspView, which I've been doing on my MR fork @ github (got to
> >> > > > > > love git
> >> > > > > and
> >> > > > > > github). By now I managed to push a complex page with many,
> >> > > > > > deeply nested
> >> > > > > > subviews, from about a  second down to the neighbourhood of
> >> > > > > > 100ms.
> >> > > > > > apparently the code I initially transformed from the old .boo
> >> > > > > > code of
> >> > > > > brail,
> >> > > > > > plus the tons of naive changes I applied over the years, was not
> >> > > > > > too good
>
> >> > > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Roelof Blom
> >> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >> Done.
> >> > > > > >> git://
>
> >> > > > > github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.AutomaticTransactionManagement.git
>
> >> > > > > >> -- Roelof.
>
> >> > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > >> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >>> :) When you’ve migrated it
>
> >> > > > > >>> From: [email protected]
> >> > > > > >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> >> > > > > >>> Roelof
> >> > > > > Blom
> >> > > > > >>> Sent: den 19 februari 2010 21:25
>
> >> > > > > >>> To: [email protected]
> >> > > > > >>> Subject: Re: So do we GIT now?
>
> >> > > > > >>> huh?
>
> >> > > > > >>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > >>> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >>> Tell me updates as you go, please.
>
> >> > > > > >>> Cheers,
>
> >> > > > > >>> Henrik
>
> >> > > > > >>> From: [email protected]
> >> > > > > >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> >> > > > > >>> Roelof
> >> > > > > Blom
> >> > > > > >>> Sent: den 19 februari 2010 20:38
> >> > > > > >>> To: [email protected]
> >> > > > > >>> Subject: Re: So do we GIT now?
>
> >> > > > > >>> I am currently working on moving the AutoTX facility.
>
> >> > > > > >>> 2010/2/19 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>
>
> >> > > > > >>> Ok, so I'll continue to move some repos to github.
>
> >> > > > > >>> I'm planning to move all the facilties on the next days. Is
> >> > > > > >>> everybody
> >> > > > > >>> ok with that?
>
> >> > > > > >>> Cheers,
> >> > > > > >>> Henry Conceição
>
> >> > > > > >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:21 PM, John Simons <
> >> > > > > [email protected]>
> >> > > > > >>> wrote:
> >> > > > > >>> > Agree
>
> >> > > > > >>> > On Feb 18, 5:19 am, Henry Conceição
> >> > > > > >>> > <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >>> >> So, we all agree that one scm is better than two and there
> >> > > > > >>> >> is no
> >> > > > > >>> >> problem to have all the history and not only the relevant
> >> > > > > >>> >> part for
> >> > > > > >>> >> each repo?
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> Cheers,
> >> > > > > >>> >> Henry Conceição
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Roelof Blom
> >> > > > > >>> >> <[email protected]
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >>> >> > Inline
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM, John Simons
> >> > > > > >>> >> > <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > >>> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> Mauricio,
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> All very good points :)
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> Inline
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> Cheers
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> John
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> On Feb 16, 12:29 pm, Mauricio Scheffer <
> >> > > > > [email protected]>
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >  * It's simpler to have one SCM than two.
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> I agree, but I thought we were going to freeze svn and
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> make it
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> readonly, or is this not the plan?
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> > Which thread was that decided on? I don't like the idea
> >> > > > > >>> >> > of having
> >> > > > > >>> >> > two SCM's,
> >> > > > > >>> >> > see the recent thread on the users list about APTCA in
> >> > > > > >>> >> > which
> >> > > > > people
> >> > > > > >>> >> > checkout
> >> > > > > >>> >> > from the "wrong" svn project. Another reason not to keep
> >> > > > > >>> >> > SVN is to
> >> > > > > >>> >> > bring
> >> > > > > >>> >> > down bandwith costs for Stronghold.
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >  * Browsing history is a big selling point of git,
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> > since you
> >> > > > > have
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> > all
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> > history locally there is no network overhead.
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> No problems with this except maybe as Roelof pointed out
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> "I
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> expected
> >> > > > > >>> >> >> to see only "relevant" commits" to the current project.
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> > As I also pointed out this was my expectation, which can
> >> > > > > >>> >> > be far
> >> > > > > off
> >> > > > > >>> >> > reality
> >> > > > > >>> >> > :-)
> >> > > > > >>> >> > I'm with Mauricio on this. If all that history is really
> >> > > > > >>> >> > annoying
> >> > > > > >>> >> > the hell
> >> > > > > >>> >> > out of somebody he can always do some magic with
> >> > > > > git-filter-branch.
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> > -- Roelof.
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> > --
> >> > > > > >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to
> >> > > > > >>> >> > the Google
> >> > > > > >>> >> > Groups
> >> > > > > >>> >> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> > > > > >>> >> > To post to this group, send email to
> >> > > > > >>> >> > [email protected].
> >> > > > > >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> >> > > > > >>> >> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> >> > > > > .
> >> > > > > >>> >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > > > > >>> >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> >> > > > > >>> > --
> >> > > > > >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> > > > > >>> > Google
> >> > > > > >>> > Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> > > > > >>> > To post to this group, send email to
> >> > > > > >>> > [email protected].
> >> > > > > >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> >> > > > > >>> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> >> > > > > .
> >> > > > > >>> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > > > > >>> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> >> > > > > >>> --
>
> >> > > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> > > > > >>> Google
> >> > > > > Groups
> >> > > > > >>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> > > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> >> > > > > >>> [email protected].
> >> > > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> >> > > > > >>> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> >> > > > > .
> >> > > > > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >> > > > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> >> > > > > >>> --
>
> >> > > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> > > > > >>> Google
> >> > > > > Groups
> >> > > > > >>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> > > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> >> > > > > >>> [email protected].
> >> > > > > >>> To
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to