Correction, they are setup like that for the build tools, not the build scripts.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. ActiveRecordIntegration facility and Binder are already setup like > this. > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:00 AM, John Simons > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Ok so submodules in git are not an easy thing and the issues that they >> bring are not trivial. >> We also know from experience with svn that users want to be able to build >> our projects fast and easily. >> So I think in git we should include with each project the buildscripts and >> also the build tools, and because submodules are difficult to manage I vote >> for us to include copies of them in each project. >> I know it is going to be painful to update and is replication but in the >> end I believe it is the best solution. >> Thoughts? >> >> Cheers John >> >> On 23/02/2010, at 15:48, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Re the use of submodules, so how come we are using them for the >> buildscripts? >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> On Feb 22, 10:58 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: >> Inline >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM, John Simons <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> Thanks guys, good links :) >> >> Re repositories on github, I've noticed we've added a submodule for >> the buildscripts to the already migrated projects, I was wondering if >> it makes also sense to add the buildtools(Nant, nunit, ....) as >> submodules so that we can just clone and build? >> >> I've tried this but submodules work differently than svn:externals, and >> come >> with a whole share of problems, check this out: >> http://progit.org/book/ch6-6.html >> >> >> >> Also, the following repositories can be deleted: >> Castle.Components.EmailSender >> Castle.Facilities.BatchRegistration >> Castle.Services.Logging >> Castle.Facilities.Cache >> Castle.Services.Transaction >> >> Will do >> >> >> >> and finally, the presentation that Krzysztof pointed me to >> mentions .gitignore file, should we add this file to each repository >> to exclude bin, obj,....? >> >> Yup >> >> >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> On Feb 22, 7:54 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: >> John, >> >> watch this presentation: >> http://jagregory.com/writings/git-e-van-recording/ >> >> very good stuff that will kickstart you into using git >> >> On 22 Lut, 08:47, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Mauricio or Henry, >> >> Can I please have one of you migration "TemplateEngine Component"? >> I would do it, but I have zero experience using git, so I feel very >> nervous doing it! >> >> Also, can someone give me some pointers on what to install on my >> workstation? Do I install both msysgit (any specific configuration or >> just use defaults when installing it) and tortoisegit? Any advice is >> welcomed :) >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> On Feb 20, 10:19 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 10x >> >> 2010/2/20 Henry Conceição <[email protected]> >> >> I can take care of MR too, if someone doesn't step in. >> >> Cheers, >> Henry Conceição >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> any chance someone might be able to do the history trick for MR? >> all of my spare OSS time is now consumed by performance >> improvements to >> AspView, which I've been doing on my MR fork @ github (got to >> love git >> and >> github). By now I managed to push a complex page with many, >> deeply nested >> subviews, from about a second down to the neighbourhood of >> 100ms. >> apparently the code I initially transformed from the old .boo >> code of >> brail, >> plus the tons of naive changes I applied over the years, was not >> too good >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Roelof Blom < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Done. >> git:// >> >> >> github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.AutomaticTransactionManagement.git >> >> -- Roelof. >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> :) When you’ve migrated it >> >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Roelof >> Blom >> Sent: den 19 februari 2010 21:25 >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: So do we GIT now? >> >> huh? >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Tell me updates as you go, please. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Henrik >> >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Roelof >> Blom >> Sent: den 19 februari 2010 20:38 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: So do we GIT now? >> >> I am currently working on moving the AutoTX facility. >> >> 2010/2/19 Henry Conceição <[email protected]> >> >> Ok, so I'll continue to move some repos to github. >> >> I'm planning to move all the facilties on the next days. Is >> everybody >> ok with that? >> >> Cheers, >> Henry Conceição >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:21 PM, John Simons < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> Agree >> >> On Feb 18, 5:19 am, Henry Conceição < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> So, we all agree that one scm is better than two and there >> is no >> problem to have all the history and not only the relevant >> part for >> each repo? >> >> Cheers, >> Henry Conceição >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Roelof Blom < >> [email protected] >> >> wrote: >> Inline >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM, John Simons >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Mauricio, >> >> All very good points :) >> Inline >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> On Feb 16, 12:29 pm, Mauricio Scheffer < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> * It's simpler to have one SCM than two. >> I agree, but I thought we were going to freeze svn and >> make it >> readonly, or is this not the plan? >> >> Which thread was that decided on? I don't like the idea of >> having >> two SCM's, >> see the recent thread on the users list about APTCA in >> which >> people >> checkout >> from the "wrong" svn project. Another reason not to keep >> SVN is to >> bring >> down bandwith costs for Stronghold. >> >> * Browsing history is a big selling point of git, >> since you >> have >> all >> history locally there is no network overhead. >> No problems with this except maybe as Roelof pointed out >> "I >> expected >> to see only "relevant" commits" to the current project. >> >> As I also pointed out this was my expectation, which can >> be far >> off >> reality >> :-) >> I'm with Mauricio on this. If all that history is really >> annoying >> the hell >> out of somebody he can always do some magic with >> git-filter-branch. >> >> -- Roelof. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to >> the Google >> Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> Google >> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> Google >> Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> Google >> Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> Google >> Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> >> ... >> >> read more » >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
