My point is: if you need the history, it will be there, and it will be usable/buildable. If you don't need the history, shallow clone. If we "partially" remove history, we will break older builds.
-- Mauricio On Feb 15, 12:14 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps (probably) it's my expectation that's wrong, I expected to see only > "relevant" commits. It's confusing to see MonoRail commits on the facilty > log. > > The fetching is very slow indeed, because it's fetching so much. The size on > disk of the AR facility is over 100MB. > > -- Roelof. > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Mauricio Scheffer < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, that was the point of this process: to have old history... other > > projects' history *could* be removed with further filter-branching but > > it's difficult and ultimately doesn't add any value. In 2004 or > > whenever the AR facility was started there was no independent AR > > facility project, it was all part of the same build. If someone needed > > to build RC2 he would need the whole thing anyway. If we just left the > > AR facility directory in the 2004 history it would be broken if you go > > back to that time. > > > If it bothers people to have to fetch all that history, use shallow > > clones. I implemented shallow clones in horn to minimize data > > transfer, and they can be used even for submodules to avoid history > > duplication in the superproject. > > > -- > > Mauricio > > > On Feb 15, 11:37 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Mauricio, > > > > There must have gone something wrong with the migration, the git log of > > the > > > AR facility shows each and every commit that was made since 2004... > > > > -- Roelof. > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Mauricio Scheffer < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > I just migrated the ARFacility: > > > >http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.ActiveRecordIntegra. > > .. > > > > > Here's a step by step guide of the process, complete with screenshots: > > > >http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddvpz7mf_202gzpzbjcx > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Mauricio > > > > > On Feb 2, 10:07 am, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Roelof has tried my process with ARFacility and it turned out it > > isn't > > > > > very clear, I will run the process on another project, then copy & > > > > > paste here the exact commands I run plus maybe a couple of > > > > > screenshots. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Mauricio > > > > > > On Feb 2, 3:54 am, Krzysztof Ko¼mic <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Do we move officially to Git now with the projects that were > > released? > > > > > > > Krzysztof > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > > > . > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%2Bun > > > > [email protected]><castle-project-devel%2Bun > > [email protected]> > > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%2Bun > > [email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
