Well, there are arguments pro and contra merging it with AR. The pro argument is that for some of the features I envision for AR3, I'll need a DI container anyway. Since MK and Windsor are now merged, the dependency on Windsor is needed anyway.
The contra argument is that right now I have absolutely no time (only scanning the mailing list every other week or so) and this won't change before July or August. -Markus 2010/4/10 Henry Conceição <[email protected]> > But if we bundle it with AR, it'll make AR Windsor dependent. > > Cheers, > Henry Conceição > > > > 2010/4/10 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>: > > The facility still has no leader and still was not released. > > > > I think it makes sense to bundle it with AR (same way logging facility > > is bundled with Windsor). > > > > Markus, what's your opinion? > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
