I couldn't agree more, and looking at one of recent build logs:
http://builds.castleproject.org/viewLog.html?buildId=5710&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=bt50
it looks like we did that, so I think it's a recent change that affected
that somehow.
K
On 2010-06-10 22:37, Roelof Blom wrote:
I think it's a relic and we should try and build from one solution.
2010/6/10 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Did we change something WRT how Silverlight version of Core get built?
Last time I checked SL version was built from the same solution as
.NET version, and now it tries (and fails) to find dedicated SL
solution.
Was that a conscious change?
K
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:castle-project-devel%[email protected]>.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
