I'm a bit confused here. I thought you had the solution file generating both silverlight and .net now. If you need ST, there's a fork at http://github.com/JulianBirch/Castle.Core which generates a working solution file using the targets in the build file. (It's also got the artefacts checked in, but I wouldn't do that on trunk...)
One day, I need to understand MSBuild 4 properly... J 2010/6/10 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > That would complicate things I think. > > We might add a target to the build file at some point to have it generate > the files using just one click, but that's future. For now I want to get the > build going and it's best if we stick to just single solution for that. > > K > > > On 2010-06-11 07:35, John Simons wrote: > > Also, if we are using Julian's solution to keep VS solutions/projects in > sync, wouldn't make sense to use the generated sln/proj files to build, this > would validate that we have valid files. and since the files are auto gen > anyway, there is no overhead right? > > Just my 2 cents > John > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Krzysztof Koźmic > <[email protected]><[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Fri, 11 June, 2010 7:22:51 AM > *Subject:* Re: silverlight build > > No we're not. > > That's what Julian's Solution Transform tool was created for - create SL > solution based on .NET solution. > > K > > On 2010-06-11 07:20, John Simons wrote: > > Oops, I think that was me! > But if we not using the silverlight solution file then how do I go about > opening the VS solution for silverlight? Are we keeping it in sync? > > Cheers > John > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Krzysztof Koźmic > <[email protected]><[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Thu, 10 June, 2010 10:46:41 PM > *Subject:* Re: silverlight build > > I couldn't agree more, and looking at one of recent build logs: > http://builds.castleproject.org/viewLog.html?buildId=5710&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=bt50 > it looks like we did that, so I think it's a recent change that affected > that somehow. > > K > > On 2010-06-10 22:37, Roelof Blom wrote: > > I think it's a relic and we should try and build from one solution. > > 2010/6/10 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > >> Did we change something WRT how Silverlight version of Core get built? >> >> Last time I checked SL version was built from the same solution as .NET >> version, and now it tries (and fails) to find dedicated SL solution. >> >> Was that a conscious change? >> >> K >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
