If the "Corey" that made that comment is the same Corey from this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users/browse_thread/thread/f129c7f61ad48267/3c06746c7c619dd0?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=corey#3c06746c7c619dd0 I wonder if he tried the Lazy Component Loaders as indicated in the FAQ. Just wondering... --- Patrick Steele http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:37 PM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > "Feeling like a move myself. Mostly because I think Castle’s ugliness > is due to their inability to listen to their own community. It’s very > annoying to request a feature and be directed to an FAQ discussing why > they won’t support it. Typically stating that they are protecting you > from yourself, rather than implementing a feature that exists in many > other containers. I’ve used StructureMap recently and LOVE it. It’s > amazing how much simpler and less verbose it is to use, even for some > of the more advanced use cases." > > http://www.lanwin.de/2010/07/20/why-i-moved-from-windsor-to-autofac/ > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
