WRT positional parameters that were mentioned as an upside of Autofac,
what's your opinion guys?
I really feel strongly against leaking details like whether it's a .ctor
dependency or a property, or what order of the .ctor parameters is.
I like that about Windsor that it abstracts it away - it's a
"dependency" of type and with name, and it will figure the rest out.
Have any of you ever felt a need to have that?
I'm asking because I plan to do some changes to Windsor's resolution
pipeline in v3 that might potentially enable that (for good or worse),
although I'm again - against having this OOTB. We can have a page with
FAQ explaining how to implement this of someone wants... wait
Krzysztof
On 21/07/2010 7:56 AM, Henry Conceição wrote:
Someone said the same thing on the Monorail Future or 2.1 Roadmap thread.
Cheers,
Henry Conceição
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:42 PM, John Simons<[email protected]> wrote:
This is also interesting:
"At the end Windsor feels old and ugly (like it is with Monorail compared to
MVC)."
Cheers
John
________________________________
From: hammett<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, 21 July, 2010 4:37:52 AM
Subject: Interesting feedback
"Feeling like a move myself. Mostly because I think Castle’s ugliness
is due to their inability to listen to their own community. It’s very
annoying to request a feature and be directed to an FAQ discussing why
they won’t support it. Typically stating that they are protecting you
from yourself, rather than implementing a feature that exists in many
other containers. I’ve used StructureMap recently and LOVE it. It’s
amazing how much simpler and less verbose it is to use, even for some
of the more advanced use cases."
http://www.lanwin.de/2010/07/20/why-i-moved-from-windsor-to-autofac/
--
Cheers,
hammett
http://hammett.castleproject.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
