I'd much rather kill it than introduce .Web.dll
On 12/09/2010 4:44 PM, hammett wrote:
But again, this is such esoteric type that I dont think it worth the
trouble. just kill it..
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:43 PM, hammett<[email protected]> wrote:
But you could have Castle.Core.Web
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Jonathon Rossi<[email protected]> wrote:
We can't actually use it because you can't put a dependency from Castle.Core
to Castle.MonoRail.Framework, for example.
--
Cheers,
hammett
http://hammett.castleproject.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
