I agree, I don't want to see a Castle.Core.Web.

So are options are now:
1. Use the reflection approach Patrick has provided to avoid the System.Web
compile time dependency.
2. Remove the WebLogger completely.

2010/9/12 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>

>  I'd much rather kill it than introduce .Web.dll
>
>
>
> On 12/09/2010 4:44 PM, hammett wrote:
>
>> But again, this is such esoteric type that I dont think it worth the
>> trouble. just kill it..
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:43 PM, hammett<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> But you could have Castle.Core.Web
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Jonathon Rossi<[email protected]>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> We can't actually use it because you can't put a dependency from
>>>> Castle.Core
>>>> to Castle.MonoRail.Framework, for example.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> hammett
>>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Jono

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to