yep.. On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > True. But this only holds on .NET 4 I believe. > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:19 PM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I believe we only need aptca if we have any code marked as critical. >> We should enable transparency by default, though. >> Transparency basically means that we inherit the trust from the >> caller, and dont make demands or elevate in any way. >> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > We have level 2 transparency in the .NET 4 builds, not enabled yet by >> > default though. >> > Regardless of security transparency level it's my understanding you >> > still >> > need the APTCA attribute to be able to run in the ASP.NET medium trust >> > sandbox. Or is [SecuritySafeCritical] completely the same? >> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:07 PM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Make it transparent instead. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > This topic has come up before, but I am wondering if we should make >> >> > Core >> >> > and >> >> > Windsor (and maybe more projects in the future) build with APTCA the >> >> > default, so they work in medium trust right away. >> >> > Is anyone seeing real, not theoretical, problems with this? log4net >> >> > has >> >> > been >> >> > APTCA for ages and to the best of my knowledge this has been >> >> > troublefree. >> >> > -- Roelof >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > Groups >> >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> >> > To post to this group, send email to >> >> > [email protected]. >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> > [email protected]. >> >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Cheers, >> >> hammett >> >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> Groups >> >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> >> To post to this group, send email to >> >> [email protected]. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> [email protected]. >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >
-- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
