Maybe we should use the one in EF4! http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.entity.design.pluralizationservices.pluralizationservice%28VS.100%29.aspx
John From: Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> To: Castle Project Devel <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 1:43 PM Subject: Move Inflector to Castle.Core.dll Hi, I've been looking at extending Windsor's DefaultInterface method for matching services to components to support generics and I found that in many cases the naming pattern uses plural form. so you have: public class CustomersRepository:IRepository<Customer> { } so to match that it would make sense to use Inflector to pluralize the name of the class to match the service properly. So does anyone have any objections against moving Inflector class for ActiveRecord to Castle.Core.dll ? I think it has more generic usage than just for AR. Krzysztof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
