-1
It's .NET 4 only, doesn't work in Silverlight and lives in some stupidly
named assembly.
On 01/03/2011 1:04 PM, John Simons wrote:
Maybe we should use the one in EF4!
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.entity.design.pluralizationservices.pluralizationservice%28VS.100%29.aspx
John
*From:* Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
*To:* Castle Project Devel <[email protected]>
*Cc:*
*Sent:* Tuesday, 1 March 2011 1:43 PM
*Subject:* Move Inflector to Castle.Core.dll
Hi,
I've been looking at extending Windsor's DefaultInterface method for
matching services to components to support generics and I found that
in many cases the naming pattern uses plural form.
so you have:
public class Customer*s*Repository:IRepository<Customer> { }
so to match that it would make sense to use Inflector to pluralize the
name of the class to match the service properly.
So does anyone have any objections against moving Inflector class for
ActiveRecord to Castle.Core.dll ?
I think it has more generic usage than just for AR.
Krzysztof
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
