It would be nice to convert all the tests in NH Facility to be in-memory. The amount of connection strings all over the place is also a headache to maintain :(
Henry, sorry to hear that, I'm very protective of my dev machine, my policy is not to install crap in it. If I really need it, then I use a VM. Cheers John ________________________________ From: Henry Conceição <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 10:36 AM Subject: Re: Readonly transactions - yet again. Luck guy! I had to rip off my machine with a Oracle instance not so long ago... Cheers, Henry Conceição On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:33 PM, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > No worries Henry. > Unfortunately for Jordan, I'm not willing to pollute my dev machine with SQL > Server, otherwise I would have done it. > Cheers > John > > > ________________________________ > From: Henry Conceição <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 10:30 AM > Subject: Re: Readonly transactions - yet again. > > John, > > Since from the begging I'm against to add this feature to the tx > support. I do concur that nh read only sessions are usefull (and at > some situations mandatory), but for me, read only transactions in the > way that Transactions are know in the .net platform doesn't makes > sense. > > If you guys want to push a way to expose the read only session without > mixing it with the tx facility, I'm here to help. But for this tx read > only stuff, it's up to you guys to get it up and running. > > Cheers, > Henry Conceição > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:09 PM, John Simons <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Henry, >> >> Since you are most familiar with NH facility + the new NH readonly >> feature, >> can u review the patch, and if no good, re-write it to use the native nh >> api? >> Unless Tuna Toksoz is still looking after this facility? >> Cheers >> John >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Henry Conceição <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 10:04 AM >> Subject: Re: Readonly transactions - yet again. >> >> If it uses the functionality provided by nhibernate, yes. Otherwise, >> will lead to wrong assumptions. >> >> Cheers, >> Henry Conceição >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:58 PM, John Simons <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Henry, >>> All I'm after is someone that can merge + run the unit tests locally >>> against >>> a sql server instance. >>>>Also, Nh nows support read only sessions natively. That should be useful >>>> in >>>> scenarios like this. >>> Cool, so this change makes more and more sense then :) >>> >>> Cheers >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Henry Conceição <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 9:24 AM >>> Subject: Re: Readonly transactions - yet again. >>> >>> Also, Nh nows support read only sessions natively. That should be >>> useful in scenarios like this. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Henry Conceição >>> >>> >>> >>> 2011/3/14 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>: >>>> By new I meant the 2.5.3 version. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Henry Conceição >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2011/3/14 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>: >>>>> To release the nh facility with these changes, I would have to release >>>>> the tx stuff first, and this is not on my schedule. I will only >>>>> release a update for the tx facility, with the new Windsor. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Henry Conceição >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, John Simons >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> 2/3 projects are merged :) >>>>>> >>>>>> The only outstanding project is >>>>>> Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration. >>>>>> The reason I didn't do that one is because it requires me to have >>>>>> access to some a sql server database :( No in-memory tests! >>>>>> Could someone with access to a sql server merge >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration/pull/1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Henry, it looks like you are getting ready to do a release? Can u >>>>>> please include this pull request. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> John >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 7, 1:55 pm, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> It's OK for a resource to not support readonly semantics. In this >>>>>>> case >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> resource should either mimic the behavior artificially or throw an >>>>>>> exception. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, John Simons >>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Jordan, >>>>>>> > I'm not merging your pull request because of the concerns raised by >>>>>>> > Henry. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Henry, >>>>>>> > I let u take over this one, since u know a lot more about these >>>>>>> > Components/Facilities than me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Cheers >>>>>>> > John >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > On Mar 3, 8:34 pm, Jordan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> > > > I think I just found it: >>>>>>> >http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Services.Transaction/pull/1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > > > Is this it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > > Yes, also these 2: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >https://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegrat.... >>>>>>> > .. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > > There was one change Hammett pointed out needed to be made in >>>>>>> > > this >>>>>>> > > file: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >https://github.com/gusgorman/Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration/... >>>>>>> > > where the call to ResetFlushMode() shouldn't be from within the ! >>>>>>> > > isAmbient clause. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > > many thanks, >>>>>>> > > Jordan. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> > Groups >>>>>>> > "Castle Project Development List" group. >>>>>>> > To post to this group, send email to >>>>>>> > [email protected] >>>>>>> > . >>>>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> > [email protected]. >>>>>>> > For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/ >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
