We did tried it in the past for AR, and there were some random errors
on the uts, if I remember it right.

Cheers,
Henry Conceição



On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:43 PM, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
> It would be nice to convert all the tests in NH Facility to be in-memory.
> The amount of connection strings all over the place is also a headache to
> maintain :(
> Henry, sorry to hear that, I'm very protective of my dev machine, my policy
> is not to install crap in it. If I really need it, then I use a VM.
> Cheers
> John
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Henry Conceição <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 10:36 AM
> Subject: Re: Readonly transactions - yet again.
>
> Luck guy! I had to rip off my machine with a Oracle instance not so long
> ago...
>
> Cheers,
> Henry Conceição
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:33 PM, John Simons <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> No worries Henry.
>> Unfortunately for Jordan, I'm not willing to pollute my dev machine with
>> SQL
>> Server, otherwise I would have done it.
>> Cheers
>> John
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Henry Conceição <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 10:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: Readonly transactions - yet again.
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Since from the begging I'm against to add this feature to the tx
>> support. I do concur that nh read only sessions are usefull (and at
>> some situations mandatory), but for me, read only transactions in the
>> way that Transactions are know in the .net platform doesn't makes
>> sense.
>>
>> If you guys want to push a way to expose the read only session without
>> mixing it with the tx facility, I'm here to help. But for this tx read
>> only stuff, it's up to you guys to get it up and running.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Henry Conceição
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:09 PM, John Simons <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Henry,
>>>
>>> Since you are most familiar with NH facility + the new NH readonly
>>> feature,
>>> can u review the patch, and if no good, re-write it to use the native nh
>>> api?
>>> Unless Tuna Toksoz is still looking after this facility?
>>> Cheers
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Henry Conceição <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 10:04 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Readonly transactions - yet again.
>>>
>>> If it uses the functionality provided by nhibernate, yes. Otherwise,
>>> will lead to wrong assumptions.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Henry Conceição
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:58 PM, John Simons <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Henry,
>>>> All I'm after is someone that can merge + run the unit tests locally
>>>> against
>>>> a sql server instance.
>>>>>Also, Nh nows support read only sessions natively. That should be useful
>>>>> in
>>>>> scenarios like this.
>>>> Cool, so this change makes more and more sense then :)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Henry Conceição <[email protected]>
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 9:24 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Readonly transactions - yet again.
>>>>
>>>> Also, Nh nows support read only sessions natively. That should be
>>>> useful in scenarios like this.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Henry Conceição
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2011/3/14 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>:
>>>>> By new I meant the 2.5.3 version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Henry Conceição
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/3/14 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> To release the nh facility with these changes, I would have to release
>>>>>> the tx stuff first, and this is not on my schedule. I will only
>>>>>> release a update for the tx facility, with the new Windsor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Henry Conceição
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, John Simons
>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 2/3 projects are merged :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The only outstanding project is
>>>>>>> Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration.
>>>>>>> The reason I didn't do that one is because it requires me to have
>>>>>>> access to some a sql server database :(  No in-memory tests!
>>>>>>> Could someone with access to a sql server merge
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration/pull/1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Henry, it looks like you are getting ready to do a release? Can u
>>>>>>> please include this pull request.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 7, 1:55 pm, hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> It's OK for a resource to not support readonly semantics. In this
>>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> resource should either mimic the behavior artificially or throw an
>>>>>>>> exception.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, John Simons
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > Jordan,
>>>>>>>> > I'm not merging your pull request because of the concerns raised
>>>>>>>> > by
>>>>>>>> > Henry.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > Henry,
>>>>>>>> > I let u take over this one, since u know a lot more about these
>>>>>>>> > Components/Facilities than me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > Cheers
>>>>>>>> > John
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > On Mar 3, 8:34 pm, Jordan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> > > > I think I just found it:
>>>>>>>> >http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Services.Transaction/pull/1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > > > Is this it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > > Yes, also these 2:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>> > > > > >https://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegrat....
>>>>>>>> > ..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > > There was one change Hammett pointed out needed to be made in
>>>>>>>> > > this
>>>>>>>> > > file:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>> > > > > >https://github.com/gusgorman/Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration/...
>>>>>>>> > > where the call to ResetFlushMode() shouldn't be from within the
>>>>>>>> > > !
>>>>>>>> > > isAmbient clause.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > > many thanks,
>>>>>>>> > > Jordan.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> > Groups
>>>>>>>> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>>>>>>> > To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>> > [email protected]
>>>>>>>> > .
>>>>>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>> > [email protected].
>>>>>>>> > For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>>> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to