Actually I think it does have a new name, it's called MR+++, is this right Hamilton?
Cheers, John On 19/04/2011, at 14:41, Ricardo Borges <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sorry for the intrusion, I'm just an user, but I would like to give my 2 > cents: > > I think that an application written in MR2 couldn't be converted into MR3 is > a big problem. Why choose MR3 with no assurances that MR4 will be compatible? > I suppose that most of users would like to update MR2 and keep following its > evolution, naturally. > > Maybe, that new Castle MVC framework with better design, features.. could > have a new name, and keep the MR2 in maintenance and evolution... > > > 2011/4/19 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > yes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > > -- > Ricardo Borges > http://ivoidness.blogspot.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
