Hi Henrik, Sorry I've got no idea what a 'custom inspector' is, and a quick google hasn't helped. Can you point me in the right direction?
regards, Jordan. On Aug 4, 11:39 pm, "Henrik Feldt" <[email protected]> wrote: > How would you like to solve the problem if you get to choose? > > A ';'-separated string, for example? Or would you add some 'custom > inspector' to a pipeline when checking whether a method should be wrapped? > > Regards, > Henrik > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jordan > Sent: den 1 augusti 2011 13:30 > To: Castle Project Development List > Subject: TransactionAttribute.CustomContext > > Hello all, > > I've just had my first look at the new Castle.Transactions code. In the > discussion about read only transactions it was suggested that we could use > the "CustomContext" property to pass in the read only flag. > However, as far as I understand it IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, > object>> is not a valid attribute parameter type. > > Or is there some new funky syntax that I'm not aware of? > > cheers, > Jordan. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
