No problem, visitor pattern I do know :) That could be cool - how would you specify the visitor? Through another attribute?
regards, Jordan. On Aug 10, 9:55 pm, "Henrik Feldt" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, sorry, it's just me speaking strangely. I mean that I could add > something like the visitor pattern (inspectors) where the inspectors can be > allowed to have their say about the type of transaction to create, from the > CreateTransaction > method:https://github.com/haf/Castle.Transactions/blob/master/src/Castle.Ser... > ransaction/TransactionManager.cs > > Regards, > Henrik > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jordan > Sent: den 10 augusti 2011 12:51 > To: Castle Project Development List > Subject: Re: TransactionAttribute.CustomContext > > Hi Henrik, > > Sorry I've got no idea what a 'custom inspector' is, and a quick google > hasn't helped. Can you point me in the right direction? > > regards, > Jordan. > > On Aug 4, 11:39 pm, "Henrik Feldt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > How would you like to solve the problem if you get to choose? > > > A ';'-separated string, for example? Or would you add some 'custom > > inspector' to a pipeline when checking whether a method should be wrapped? > > > Regards, > > Henrik > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jordan > > Sent: den 1 augusti 2011 13:30 > > To: Castle Project Development List > > Subject: TransactionAttribute.CustomContext > > > Hello all, > > > I've just had my first look at the new Castle.Transactions code. In > > the discussion about read only transactions it was suggested that we > > could use the "CustomContext" property to pass in the read only flag. > > However, as far as I understand it IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, > > object>> is not a valid attribute parameter type. > > > Or is there some new funky syntax that I'm not aware of? > > > cheers, > > Jordan. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
