So the experience is two fold: 1 - users download our stuff. it's easy to provide a decent experience here. 2 - *contributors* need to be able to get their feet quickly. and this is my main concern.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: > Right, but if we can provide a good experience without rake, such as > packages with the pre-built DLLs and symbols linked to source code with e.g. > symbolsource.org, then newcomers might not have to build - in order to make > building it manually something that warrants being able to download an > executable and install it? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of hammett > Sent: den 13 augusti 2011 21:02 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Builds > > I'm ok with anything beyond MSBuild. The only thing I dont like about rake > is being forced to install Ruby. This may create another layer of complexity > for newcomers. > > I've tried FAKE last weekend and it's self-contained enough for my needs. > > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> >> >> Starting an old question now that some water has passed under the bridges: >> how to easiest build the castle projects. As you know I have been >> building Transactions with rake for a while now, and it's working well. >> >> >> >> But I still thought it took too much time to change existing projects >> into albacore/rake. So I created a gem called 'logirel'. It scaffolds >> a complete rakefile with nuspecs, semver-versioning, nuget, nuget push >> tasks, output tasks etc. It's not perfect, but to show what it can do, >> I ran it on Windsor's repository and made a pull-request out of it: >> >> >> >> https://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/pull/13 >> >> >> >> Try merging locally and running both 'rake' and 'rake -T' to see its >> capabilities (or cloning haf/Castle.Windsor). First, of course, you >> need to install what's in the bundle with: >> >> >> >> $ gem install bundle >> >> $ bundle install >> >> >> >> If you want to try out logirel, it's as simple as standing in the >> folder you want to remake and running: >> >> $ logirel >> >> and then answering the questions. You need to set up a tools/nuget.exe >> directory after it's done. >> >> >> >> What do you think guys? >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Henrik >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
