OK, awesome then. I'm happy where I am thank you.
On Oct 25, 6:24 pm, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > As long as another repository is under /castleproject and abide to its rules. > > The explanation for the veto is the whole other thread. I dont see you > making your concerns clear, instead you confront/attack. My time is > too precious to waste on these energy draining activities. It's not > the first time it happens with you and I'm sure it wont be the last. > Like I said before, if you want full control over your projects, move > it somewhere else. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Henrik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you still do that if it's a part of another *git repository* like I > > suggested in my last e-mail? > > > Also, remember this: > > "Vetos with no explanation are void" > > > On Oct 25, 5:51 pm, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >>http://www.castleproject.org/community/bylaws.html > > >> I veto it. > > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > @hammett: > > >> > But you are not backtracking from this thread. It’s a new project, by > >> > majority vote. So castle is *the* vehicle. > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > Henrik > > >> > From: [email protected] > >> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hamilton > >> > Verissimo de Oliveira > >> > Sent: den 29 september 2011 22:44 > >> > To: Henrik Feldt; [email protected] > > >> > Subject: RE: New Castle.IO project? > > >> > Go for it > > >> > Sent from my Windows Phone > > >> > ________________________________ > > >> > From: Henrik Feldt > >> > Sent: 9/29/2011 12:45 PM > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Subject: RE: New Castle.IO project? > > >> > What does hammett think? Green light? > > >> > From: [email protected] > >> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sebastien > >> > Lambla > >> > Sent: den 29 september 2011 16:14 > >> > To: G. Richard Bellamy; [email protected] > >> > Cc: Bertrand Le Roy; Henrik Feldt > >> > Subject: RE: New Castle.IO project? > > >> > Well no because o.exe is separate from everything else, we’ve had issues > >> > before because of that. It’s all rather complicated. > > >> > What I discussed with Henrik was to migrate to a common codebase while > >> > preserving some of the existing assemblies and namespaces on my side, > >> > using > >> > some sort of templating. I’m gonna have to re-review those plans end of > >> > next > >> > week so maybe I’ll find a better way to solve this. > > >> > From: G. Richard Bellamy [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > Sent: 29 September 2011 14:51 > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Cc: Sebastien Lambla; Bertrand Le Roy; Henrik Feldt > >> > Subject: Re: New Castle.IO project? > > >> > Sebastian, > > >> > So, you've got a hard dependency on the OpenFileSystem namespace because > >> > you've got deployed o.exe users, and o.exe doesn't autoupdate? > > >> > Am I missing something here? If they're 1.0 users, then won't they just > >> > retain the assemblies used by o.exe, and when they upgrade, couldn't you > >> > change the dependency tree? Isn't this equivalent to removing an old, and > >> > then adding a new dependency? > > >> > -rb > > >> > On 9/29/2011 5:46 AM, Sebastien Lambla wrote: > > >> > +1 but I’m stuck with OpenFileSystem as a namespace / name, openwrap 1.0 > >> > depends on it and the shell doesn’t auto-update, changing names would > >> > break > >> > my installed based which is not ideal. > > >> > From: Bertrand Le Roy [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > Sent: 28 September 2011 22:55 > >> > To: Henrik Feldt; [email protected]; Sebastien Lambla > >> > Subject: RE: New Castle.IO project? > > >> > +1 obviously J > > >> > From: Henrik Feldt [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:24 PM > >> > To: [email protected]; Bertrand Le Roy; > >> > [email protected] > >> > Subject: New Castle.IO project? > > >> > Hello everybody, > > >> > I’m merging open file system and fluent path into what was > >> > Castle.Transactions for the transactional file systems’ benefit. > > >> > But it’s not so smooth to have it coupled to the transactional behavior – > >> > one would have to know both projects to change one, and the IO project is > >> > becoming large. > > >> > Can we create a new project Castle.IO? > > >> > This would also involve Sebastien Lambla and Bertrand Le Roy who are the > >> > authors of openfilesystem and FluentPath respectively – it would be > >> > great if > >> > they would be allowed to push to this specific repository. I generally > >> > think > >> > it’s a good thing to work together with other OSS projects and cooperate > >> > with them, which is why I’m not re-doing their work but asking them to > >> > work > >> > with me. > > >> > What do you think? > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > Henrik > > >> > PS, features for this project: > > >> > * Transactional file system > > >> > * Non-transactional file systems on Windows > > >> > * Same for *nix-systems > > >> > * A fluent API for these systems through both interfaces and extension > >> > methods on these interfaces > > >> > * Long path support (no more >245 chars exceptions) > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > Cheers, > hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
