i havent had the time to change anything. And i'm still unsure of the changes..
2011/11/1 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>: > I can still see Tx stuff in Windsor repository. > https://github.com/castleproject/Windsor > > Is that intentional? > > Krzysztof > > On 30/10/2011 11:45 PM, Henrik Feldt wrote: >> >> Put C.Tx back into its own repo, castleproject/Castle.Transactions, >> because >> it's a top-level project. >> >> castleproejct/Castle.Transactions will contain a working tree of Castle.IO >> at tags of releases. Castle.IO sub-level project. >> >> Henrik >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of hammett >> Sent: den 30 oktober 2011 02:11 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: New Castle.IO project? >> >> What was the conclusion of this whole discussion? What should be done with >> the repositories? >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Henrik Feldt<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm aware that I may be interpreted that way. You must understand that >>> this is not my intention... I will try to formulate my concerns more >>> clearly before disagreeing in the future. Since I know that I might be >>> taken this way I often suggest a phone call/skype instead, because >>> when I have those I don't sound as confrontational. >>> >>> At least I end it with; >>> Cheers, ;) >>> Henrik >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of hammett >>> Sent: den 25 oktober 2011 18:24 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: New Castle.IO project? >>> >>> As long as another repository is under /castleproject and abide to its >>> rules. >>> >>> The explanation for the veto is the whole other thread. I dont see you >>> making your concerns clear, instead you confront/attack. My time is >>> too precious to waste on these energy draining activities. It's not >>> the first time it happens with you and I'm sure it wont be the last. >>> Like I said before, if you want full control over your projects, move >>> it somewhere else. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Henrik<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Do you still do that if it's a part of another *git repository* like >>>> I suggested in my last e-mail? >>>> >>>> Also, remember this: >>>> "Vetos with no explanation are void" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 25, 5:51 pm, hammett<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.castleproject.org/community/bylaws.html >>>>> >>>>> I veto it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Henrik Feldt<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> @hammett: >>>>>> But you are not backtracking from this thread. It’s a new project, >>>>>> by majority vote. So castle is *the* vehicle. >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Henrik >>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>>>>> Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira >>>>>> Sent: den 29 september 2011 22:44 >>>>>> To: Henrik Feldt; [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: RE: New Castle.IO project? >>>>>> Go for it >>>>>> Sent from my Windows Phone >>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>> From: Henrik Feldt >>>>>> Sent: 9/29/2011 12:45 PM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: RE: New Castle.IO project? >>>>>> What does hammett think? Green light? >>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>>>>> Sebastien Lambla >>>>>> Sent: den 29 september 2011 16:14 >>>>>> To: G. Richard Bellamy; [email protected] >>>>>> Cc: Bertrand Le Roy; Henrik Feldt >>>>>> Subject: RE: New Castle.IO project? >>>>>> Well no because o.exe is separate from everything else, we’ve had >>>>>> issues before because of that. It’s all rather complicated. >>>>>> What I discussed with Henrik was to migrate to a common codebase >>>>>> while preserving some of the existing assemblies and namespaces on >>>>>> my side, using some sort of templating. I’m gonna have to >>>>>> re-review those plans end of next week so maybe I’ll find a better >>>>>> way to solve >>> >>> this. >>>>>> >>>>>> From: G. Richard Bellamy [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: 29 September 2011 14:51 >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Cc: Sebastien Lambla; Bertrand Le Roy; Henrik Feldt >>>>>> Subject: Re: New Castle.IO project? >>>>>> Sebastian, >>>>>> So, you've got a hard dependency on the OpenFileSystem namespace >>>>>> because you've got deployed o.exe users, and o.exe doesn't autoupdate? >>>>>> Am I missing something here? If they're 1.0 users, then won't they >>>>>> just retain the assemblies used by o.exe, and when they upgrade, >>>>>> couldn't you change the dependency tree? Isn't this equivalent to >>>>>> removing an old, and then adding a new dependency? >>>>>> -rb >>>>>> On 9/29/2011 5:46 AM, Sebastien Lambla wrote: >>>>>> +1 but I’m stuck with OpenFileSystem as a namespace / name, >>>>>> +openwrap 1.0 >>>>>> depends on it and the shell doesn’t auto-update, changing names >>>>>> would break my installed based which is not ideal. >>>>>> From: Bertrand Le Roy [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: 28 September 2011 22:55 >>>>>> To: Henrik Feldt; [email protected]; Sebastien >>>>>> Lambla >>>>>> Subject: RE: New Castle.IO project? >>>>>> +1 obviously J >>>>>> From: Henrik Feldt [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:24 PM >>>>>> To: [email protected]; Bertrand Le Roy; >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: New Castle.IO project? >>>>>> Hello everybody, >>>>>> I’m merging open file system and fluent path into what was >>>>>> Castle.Transactions for the transactional file systems’ benefit. >>>>>> But it’s not so smooth to have it coupled to the transactional >>>>>> behavior – one would have to know both projects to change one, and >>>>>> the IO project is becoming large. >>>>>> Can we create a new project Castle.IO? >>>>>> This would also involve Sebastien Lambla and Bertrand Le Roy who >>>>>> are the authors of openfilesystem and FluentPath respectively – it >>>>>> would be great if they would be allowed to push to this specific >>>>>> repository. I generally think it’s a good thing to work together >>>>>> with other OSS projects and cooperate with them, which is why I’m >>>>>> not re-doing their work but asking them to work with me. >>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Henrik >>>>>> PS, features for this project: >>>>>> * Transactional file system >>>>>> * Non-transactional file systems on Windows >>>>>> * Same for *nix-systems >>>>>> * A fluent API for these systems through both interfaces and >>>>>> extension methods on these interfaces >>>>>> * Long path support (no more>245 chars exceptions) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>> >>> [email protected]. >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>> >>> [email protected]. >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>> >>> [email protected]. >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>> >>> [email protected]. >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>> >>> [email protected]. >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups >>> >>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >>>> >>>> To post to this group, send email to >>> >>> [email protected]. >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >>> [email protected]. >>>> >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> hammett >>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to >> >> [email protected]. >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >>> >>> To post to this group, send email to >> >> [email protected]. >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> [email protected]. >>> >>> For more options, visit this group at >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
