thanks for the reply. I think that's another reason why we should refactor the whole validation stuff. The first one I have already described in a previous post where I talked about the problem we have when using JQuery for validation. The JQuery validation plug-in expects uses name attribute of a form element when defining rules and the validation framework of Monorail only provides the id attribute... As soon as I have some time I'll start to refactor and make a proposal. What do you think?
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:51 AM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Gabriel Schenker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > is there a "proper" way of doing it? > > I dont think there's any other way. The goal was that each custom > validator could build their browser validation representation using > the existing methods on IBrowserValidationGenerator, mostly regexp > based. In your case, you added a custom method to > IBrowserValidationGenerator so I'm afraid that's the only way to call > it. > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
