Same here. Wow me ;-)

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Roelof Blom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gabriel,
>
> You're of course very welcome to propose improvements. I am very interested
> in seeing how you will prevent the ugly downcasting while retaining some
> flexibility with regard to using different validation libraries.
>
> -- Roelof.
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Gabriel Schenker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> thanks for the reply. I think that's another reason why we should refactor
>> the whole validation stuff.
>> The first one I have already described in a previous post where I talked
>> about the problem we have when using JQuery for validation. The JQuery
>> validation plug-in expects uses name attribute of a form element when
>> defining rules and the validation framework of Monorail only provides the id
>> attribute...
>> As soon as I have some time I'll start to refactor and make a proposal.
>> What do you think?
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:51 AM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Gabriel Schenker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > is there a "proper" way of doing it?
>>>
>>> I dont think there's any other way. The goal was that each custom
>>> validator could build their browser validation representation using
>>> the existing methods on IBrowserValidationGenerator, mostly regexp
>>> based. In your case, you added a custom method to
>>> IBrowserValidationGenerator so I'm afraid that's the only way to call
>>> it.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> hammett
>>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> >
>



-- 
Cheers,
hammett
http://hammett.castleproject.org/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to