the whole package would just work. Unless, as I said, you are doing complicated stuff with DinamicProxy2, which I guess you're not.
I'm using the whole Castle stack (MonoRail, Windsor, ActiveRecord, some Components and Tools) on 3.5 without any trouble. So start digging into it and have fun. On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Carl Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks > > your mean that it can runs well but some edge cases > > how about the Activerecord? > > On 9月10日, 下午2时48分, "Ken Egozi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what do you mean by asp.net3.5? > > > > in general - yes. it (the Castle stack) runs on any .NET enabled machine, > > 2.0 and upper. > > Some edge cases when pushing DynamicProxy2 to it's extreme, might cause > some > > minor problems when you're on 3.5SP1 > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Carl Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > i'm going to use castle on asp.net3.5, > > > > > but i'm not sure whether it will work well. > > > > > i hope for your help > > > > > best regards > > > > > carl xu > > > > -- > > Ken Egozi. > http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il > > > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
