thanks for your help!
On 9月10日, 下午3时06分, "Ken Egozi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the whole package would just work.
> Unless, as I said, you are doing complicated stuff with DinamicProxy2, which
> I guess you're not.
>
> I'm using the whole Castle stack (MonoRail, Windsor, ActiveRecord, some
> Components and Tools) on 3.5 without any trouble.
>
> So start digging into it and have fun.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Carl Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks
>
> > your mean that it can runs well but some edge cases
>
> > how about the Activerecord?
>
> > On 9月10日, 下午2时48分, "Ken Egozi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > what do you mean by asp.net3.5?
>
> > > in general - yes. it (the Castle stack) runs on any .NET enabled machine,
> > > 2.0 and upper.
> > > Some edge cases when pushing DynamicProxy2 to it's extreme, might cause
> > some
> > > minor problems when you're on 3.5SP1
>
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Carl Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > i'm going to use castle on asp.net3.5,
>
> > > > but i'm not sure whether it will work well.
>
> > > > i hope for your help
>
> > > > best regards
>
> > > > carl xu
>
> > > --
> > > Ken Egozi.
> >http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castle...
>
> --
> Ken
> Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il-
> 隐藏被引用文字 -
>
> - 显示引用的文字 -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
