.net 2.0 is a major sell point currently. And I did not mean using the ms-routing as is. and also not limiting us. but rather to try and use the same basic syntax for routes.
The idea is that people with knowledge in MR routing will be able to approach MS-route guys, and help them out more easily - selling MR as a smarter option on the way. But like ayende, I don't consider it an interesting enough feature to be passionate about. On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Alex Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > If I was going to bother doing that I might as well just use the > System.Web.Routing assembly which I suspect would probably just work as a > drop-in replacement. > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Victor Kornov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Won't it be available on source servers like the rest of FW? But that will >> be next to useless in such situation considering license problems. I >> guess that could help with internal projects though :) >> >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:23 AM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Very good point, I dont think they are planning to release the routing >>> code as they did for the mvc. >>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
