jep - I figured that by now ... :) On 28 Dez., 13:47, "Jan Limpens" <[email protected]> wrote: > Just pull the sources from svn and compile them yourself. That's the > recommended path, anyway. > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Henning <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > I'm currently using the RC3, but someone recently released a bundled > > built of Castle+NHibernate, so I might switch to that and thus would > > also get the benefit of the new fluent registration API. > > > On 22 Dez., 20:13, Jason Meckley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The power of Binsor is convention over configuration. And the fluent > > > registry Component.For<>() with Windsor can take advantage of that as > > > well. > > > for example I use a generic mapper IMapper<Input, Output> : IMapper > > > {Output MapFrom(Input item); }. where IMapper is just a place holder. > > > I use > > > PickAll.Types.Of<IMapper>().From(assembly).WithSerivce.Select > > > (x=>x.GetInterfaces()[0]); > > > which selects the IMapper<,> instead of IMapper interface. > > > Another convention is placing all types to be registered in a specific > > > namespace and just select those types for registry. > > > if you get into the situation where you are loading and decorating > > > multiple services then I wire them by hand. > > > > On Dec 22, 4:51 am, Henning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > how are you registering your components? Currently I'm adding my > > > > components in the code, using the AddComponent-Method (using the RC3 > > > > Version). > > > > > But with growing projects this is getting kinda painful - I heard > > > > about binsor and stuff, but I haven't really gotten a good way at that > > > > so far. > > > > > Basically I'm wondering how are you identifying what should be added > > > > and with what interfaces. Are you looking for a certain naming > > > > convention oder classes that implement a certain interface? I tried a > > > > naive example by reflecting the interfaces a class implements, but I > > > > soon figured that I would end up with such a scenario: > > > > > interface IFooBase<T> {} > > > > > interface IFoo: IFooBase<int> {} > > > > > class Foo: IFoo {} > > > > > So I would like to register all instances of IFooBase, maybe with both > > > > interfaces IFoo and IFoo<int> ... > > -- > Jan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
